Dressing down for Facebook executive at Commons hearing

Committee chairman Helen Jones told the company: ‘You do not play games with the House of Commons’.

Press Association
Last updated: 20 June 2018 - 9.54am

Social media giant Facebook was given a ferocious dressing down by a senior MP, who accused the company of trying to “play games” with Parliament in a way which suggested it had “something to hide”.

The chairman of the Commons Petitions Committee Helen Jones complained that Facebook had behaved in a “totally unacceptable” way by trying to dictate the dates on which it would give evidence to parliamentary inquiries and the executives who would appear.

[Read more: 18 things you didn't know about Facebook]

The Labour MP warned that the committee was ready to issue summonses to ensure MPs were able to question Facebook representatives, and told the company’s UK public policy manager Karim Palant: “Young men in your company may play games.

“You do not play games with the House of Commons.”

Facebook is already embroiled in a row with another Commons committee investigating “fake news”, whose chairman Damian Collins warned he was ready to summons billionaire founder Mark Zuckerberg the next time he is in the UK.

Helen Jones said Facebook had behaved in a way MPs found ‘totally unacceptable’ (parliamentlive.tv)

Speaking at the start of a hearing to consider complaints made by model Katie Price over the abuse of disabled children like her son Harvey on social media, Ms Jones said that Facebook had responded to her committee’s inquiry “in a way which we find totally unacceptable”.

Facebook had agreed a date for the hearing, then tried to change it, then claimed its representative was on annual leave – a suggestion which MPs regarded with “scepticism” – she said.

The company had also been “unhelpful” to other committees by being slow in delivering information and not providing the correct witnesses.

Ms Jones told Mr Palant: “I want to make it very clear that your company will not be able to avoid democratic scrutiny, that it is not acceptable to try to disrupt a committee inquiry and that you do not dictate the terms of engagement – elected members do.

“You have given the impression that your company doesn’t feel that it has to be scrutinised and, frankly, that it has something to hide.

“In doing so, you have done them no service at all.

“Young men in your company may play games. You do not play games with the House of Commons.”

Facebook executive Karim Palant was given a dressing down at a parliamentary committee (parliamentlive.tv)

She warned him that the committee was ready to issue summonses to Facebook representatives to ensure that they attended to answer questions at sufficient length.

Mr Palant defended Facebook’s record on tackling abusive content and said the site felt it had a “clear responsibility to our users” to ensure their online safety.

“We have long had very clear policies around abuse and hate speech on our platform and the abuse of individuals using language that may degrade, may dehumanise and may abuse individuals and attack them for what we describe as protected categories,” he said.

“We have long included disability… as one of our specific protected categories within our community standards.”

The MPs have heard how valuable social media platforms are to disabled people and Twitter’s Nick Pickles told the committee:  “We would look at it as a failure on our part if someone’s voice was silenced by abuse.”

He said that “as an industry we have stepped up our efforts on safety more broadly in recent years” but added: “This hearing has highlighted an important area where we can do more.”

Katie O’Donovan of Google said that the company received many “flags” registering complaints about content on its YouTube service, but not all of them required action.

“One of the most-flagged pieces of content we have on YouTube is a Justin Bieber music video,” she told the committee.

“It is not because there is any hate speech in there or anything that breaks our community guidelines, it’s just that people who aren’t Justin Bieber fans tend to flag that content.”

YouTube works with “trusted flaggers” such as the Samaritans to get an expert view on which content genuinely presents a risk, she told the committee.

[Read more: Facebook privacy: How much information are you giving away?]

More from BT